Questionable Heros in the Play Julius Caesar

Questionalbe Heros in the Play Julius Caesar         Julius Caesar, a play written by the far-famed play-write William Shakespeare, had many a(prenominal) characters who could flip been headered in terms of their motives and will. close to whitethorn present had good intentions, but differents were revealed to have other things in mind than the headspring-being of the Romans. The aim of this paper is to take a look at why the main slew in this tragedy did what they did.         Julius Caesar, the center of the big ordeal, is the first logical understanding to take a look at. When he first arrives, he is hailed as a great man and offered the crown many times, refusing it each time. He is clearly the hit man of the tidy sum for that time. The question of his heroism comes when his previous actions are looked upon. He has ripe returned from cleanup spot Pompey and Pompeys sons. He did this to gain complete surmount of Rome kinda of sticking with the triumvirate that had currently ruled. He was ambitious, or so it was said, and he wanted still power. This alone shows that his motives were not as delicate as was first thought.         The next person to be looked upon in Mark Antony, apparently Julius Caesars right-hand man. He plays the part of the hero as he takes Caesars side after death and rallies the concourse against the conspirators. As he speaks to Octavius, though, he shows that he is mainly after the power also in state that the third person of their new triumvirate, Lepidus, is not a worthy adversary and is only good enough to carry messages. Antony goes on to say that they should have him (Lepidus) killed, along with all the other people they were making a list of. He was going to... This is a very well written paper, i love the mien you brought everyone into the paper, the conclusi on could have been stronger though If you wa! nt to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay